Read more about the article Kant What Is Enlightenment?
Immanuel Kant for Pianko 5 15

Kant What Is Enlightenment?

1. Enlightenment is man's emergence from his self-imposed immaturity. Immaturity is the inability to use one's understanding without guidance from another. This immaturity is self-imposed when its cause lies not in lack of understanding, but in lack of resolve and course to use it without buidance from another. Sapere Aude! Have courage to use your own understanding!" -- that is the motto of enlightenment.

Continue ReadingKant What Is Enlightenment?
Read more about the article Kant Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics
supposedly the second part of the augsburg book of miracles v0 80jvmfm04dpc1

Kant Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics

First, as concerns the sources of metaphysical cognition, its very concept implies that they cannot be empirical. Its principles (including not only its basic propositions but also its basic concepts) must never be derived from experience. It must not be physical but metaphysical knowledge, i.e., knowledge lying beyond experience. It can therefore have for its basis neither external experience, which is the source of physics proper, nor internal, which is the basis of empirical psychology. It is therefore a priori cognition, coming from pure understanding and pure reason. p.11

Continue ReadingKant Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics
Read more about the article Kant Critique of Pure Reason
Copernicusgettyimages 1422832792 1024x1024

Kant Critique of Pure Reason

From the Norman Kemp-Smith Transcendental Deduction (A) p. 143 We entitle the synthesis of the manifold in imagination transcendental, if without distinction of intuitions it is directed exclusively to the a priori combination of the manifold; and the unity of this synthesis is called tanscendental, if it is represented as a priori necessary in relation to the original unity of apperception. Since this unity of apperception underlies the possibility of all knowledge, the transcental unity of the synthesis of imagination is the pure form of all possible knowledge; and by means of it all objects of possible experience must be represented a priori. The unity of apperception in relation to the synthesis of imagination is the understanding; and this same unity, with reference to the transcendental synthesis of the imagination, the pure understanding.

Continue ReadingKant Critique of Pure Reason
Read more about the article J.J. Rousseau Discourse on the Sciences and the Arts
philosopher jean jacques rousseau 1712 1778 22539446.jpg

J.J. Rousseau Discourse on the Sciences and the Arts

But so long as power alone is on one side, and knowledge and understanding alone on the other, the learned will seldom make great objects their study, princes will still more rarely do great actions, and the peoples will continue to be, as they are, mean, corrupt and miserable.

Continue ReadingJ.J. Rousseau Discourse on the Sciences and the Arts
Read more about the article Montesquieu, The Spirit of the Laws
250px Charles Montesquieu

Montesquieu, The Spirit of the Laws

1. For the better understanding of the first four books of this work, it is to be observed that what I distinguish by the name of virtue, in a republic, is the love of one's country, that is, the love of equality. it is not a moral, nor a Christian, but a political virtue; and it is the spring which sets the republican government in motion, as honour is the spring which gives motion to monarchy. Hence it is that I have distinguished the love of one's country, and of equality, by the appellation of political virtue.

Continue ReadingMontesquieu, The Spirit of the Laws
Read more about the article Pierre Bayle, Political Writings
bayle stadsarchief 872x1280

Pierre Bayle, Political Writings

He spoke out very forthrightly against those who maintained that the authority of monarchs was unlimited. He maintained that monarchs cannot impose taxes without the consent of the people, and that they are more obliged than their subject to observe the laws of God and those of nature; and that the covenants which they make impose the same obligations on themselves as on their subjects. p.23-24

Continue ReadingPierre Bayle, Political Writings